![]() These manufacturers invest in providing quality images and the ability to get great night captures with motion. These cameras cater to those that want performance. Then you have the professional grade cameras like Dahua and Hik and a bunch of other more expensive cameras. And this is why they perform poorly at night.įurther, these companies have created proprietary solutions that keep you within their universe, so you cannot use a Ring on any VMS but Ring.īut with the convenience of slap a camera on the wall and scan a QR code and can see the cameras come at a cost of insecure systems that can be readily hacked.Īnd there is a big market for that type of consumer. All those cameras are good at night for are to tell the police what time something happened, but IDENTIFY is out of the question.įurther these companies do not allow any (or very little) user alteration of parameters like shutter speed and noise reduction - the cameras operate completely on auto settings. That nice bright image at nice that gives a great static image comes at the cost of ghosting/blur during motion. Their market studies have also shown that the average consumer favors a nice bright image. These companies have invested in making their apps as idiot-proof as possible to keep down the number of phone calls "why can't I see my camera on my app", and yet they still have full call centers just to deal with idiots that cannot simply open the app and scan the QR code. And they have been conditioned to believe it is just an accepted fact that night time quality will be poor. Why is that? Because the unsuspecting naive consumer thinks cameras are cameras. The consumer grade cameras like Ring, Arlo, Nest, Blink, and realistically Reolinks have favored simplicity over quality and performance. You need to keep in mind who the intended audiences are for each camera - consumer or professional.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |